Posted: 18.07.2007 at 07.35
The problem, I have noticed, with the very young models (here) is that they are not mature enough and tend to drop out of the business fast. Still, the agencies insist on representing them and they snob anyone above 20, saying that the career of a teenaged model can be much longuer than the career of a 20-something one. That's pretty ridiculous, considering that most have a shelf-life on the agencies' roster of less than two years. Also, I'm getting quite frustrated by the local magazines, that tend fairly often to show 14-16 years old models (that look like teens and not a day older) in their 'how to look good at the office' spread. For the life of me, why don't they pick girls that look at least 20? A 14 years old is a suit that is chosen to fit a lawyer looks like a little girl playing in her mom's wardrobe. Don't get me started on the 15 years old girl in the wedding dresses advertisement (RI-DI-CU-LOUS).
I don't know how it is in Europe, though. I hope it's better. Still, I don't mind underaged models (especially if their mother agency is in the city were their family lives) as long as they don't look *too* young. Why would anybody want to advertise anti-aging stuff with a 16 years old is beyond me.
Sorry for the rant, it's a touchy issue. The agencies here are pretty messed up.