fashion network

v. to socialise fashionably
   new posts today's posts search

Forums > Designers & Collections

John Galliano Pays Big for Plagiarism


Tania
Posts: 5201
Posted: 21.04.2007 at 19.12
John Galliano has been found guilty of plagiarism by a French court; after using a US photographer's art without permission.

Reuters reports:
Fashion designer John Galliano's company was ordered to pay 200,000 euros in damages to renowned U.S. photographer William Klein for unauthorized use of his atmospheric imagery in an advertising campaign.

The photographer, who lives in France said he was "furious" at Galliano's use of some of his half-painted photographs of street scenes in advertisements in several fashion magazines.

Klein's giant versions of contact sheets showing a series of photographs, painted over in colored enamel to highlight particular images, were a popular feature of a recent exhibition at the Pompidou Centre in Paris.

The court of first instance in Paris said Klein's "painted contacts" were a hallmark of his work and Galliano's use of imagery was clearly illegal in the absence of authorization from the photographer.

It ordered the designer to pay 150,000 euros to compensate for abuse of Klein's rights as author and 50,000 euros in damages to the image of the work that resulted from the poor quality of the reproductions.

Galliano said it would appeal the ruling with the aim of reducing the fine as it rejected the allegation its campaign could be considered "counterfeiting."


ruru
Posts: 2206
Posted: 21.04.2007 at 21.12
wow.
what made Galliano think he wouldn't have to pay to use photo's of somebody elses art? (or atleast ask nicely?)
shocking.

outfit
Posts: 20
Posted: 22.04.2007 at 15.45
I agree, he should have known better. Maybe he just thought he could get away with it?? I have heard it said though...

"Stealing one person's idea is called plagerism.
Stealing many people's ideas is called inspiration."

I thought that was quite funny.

rain
Posts: 4
Posted: 24.04.2007 at 05.39
Can't imagine William Klein being furious about being used in a Galliano ad...more like he didn't get paid for it. I think he's getting more than $200k worth of publicity from this...poor John, PR should be on overdrive I say...

ruru
Posts: 2206
Posted: 25.04.2007 at 04.04
i think he was furious because nobody asked?

Symin
Posts: 25
Posted: 25.04.2007 at 06.40
anyone got the pics/ads?

Ruby
Posts: 298
Posted: 26.04.2007 at 00.53
Didn't Galliano only copy William Klein's trademark technique of painting over photographs? I don't think that he used any of the artists actual images.

S.Mc.C.
Posts: 434
Posted: 26.04.2007 at 06.43
If he did (and I'm not saying he did), he should have to pay a hell of a lot more than a couple hundred thousand! That's effing intellectual property right theft...hmmm...maybe i'm passionate on this subject.

Daniel
Posts: 9005
Posted: 26.04.2007 at 07.08
I haven't been able to find the ads in question (yet), but here are some works by Klein.

They're a very unique style, so I can see why the ruling was made.





Daniel
Posts: 9005
Posted: 26.04.2007 at 07.14
Look and ye shall find:



Share: Facebook MySpace StumbleUpon del.icio.us digg

Join The Discussion

Want to join this discussion? Create your free Fashionising.com account below;