Posted: 27.07.2007 at 07.10
I have had the chance to go to a public school that had a special programme for gifted students. I come from a very poor background and my mother never approved of education in general (she would have had me marry young and start having kids at not even 20...)I chose to pursue it myself.
The teachers had started that programme decades ago and it was still as demanding as they had first designed it to be. It was actually a pretty efficient competitor to the private schools. What they promised was simple: small groups of students, excellent education and extremely competent and knowledgeable, motivated teachers, for the same price as public education! The student body was composed of gifted kids from poor families (to whom the programme was intended) and from kids that would otherwise be in the best private schools, but whose parents saw the economic advantage of sending them here. All the kids I know from there got into university and are doing very well academically-speaking.
We were to do all the science classes they could cram in our schedule (that meant cutting in half the number of hours allocated to them normally) one year before they were supposed to be given, with additional data to learn (as the teacher saw fit). The time freed by the compression of the science allowed us to take more classes (French grammar and litterature every day, computer programming, robotic and electronic, history, etc). Basically, that was the core of our studies.
As you can guess, it was extremely demanding and many were pushed into strings of anxiety crisis or general self-abasement. We were several hundreds in the first year of high school and about 45 students at the end. They threw out of the programme several students, but many more simply could not bear the pressure. It was a very common occurrence to see a student cry, the teacher would do nothing if it happened in their class and we even had a special room were we could go in that kind of situation. We were all social misfits. I had to work on improving my social skills in college.
Furthermore, we faced the outright hostility of the students who were attending the same school as us, but who were not in the programme and the spite of the teachers who were not chosen to teach to us. We got called âelitist bastardsâ all the time. It was horrible. The thing is, that was probably true.
Still, I greatly value the education I received and it is now a thing that is helping me greatly to excel in my field of studies. But then, I am in a field of studies that could be said easily to be one of the most demanding, elitist, and devoid of concern for all the things in life other than academic studies... I guess I simply took a liking to that kind of thing, as it was all that was valued and that I was taught to do. Most of my colleagues come from very similar backgrounds (we get along nicely).
All the students from there that I saw a few years later considered themselves lucky and proud to have gone through all this â it certainly showed us perseverance and resilience - and my friends who stayed in the normal programme end up regretting it, often blaming their so-so academic record on that. Yes, it was hard. Yes, it asked us to forget about ourselves and only concentrate on our studies. However, the benefits were greats: we learnt a lot, we knew directly what was academic rigor, we learnt how hard work pays, it gave poor kids a change of milieu and values and it opened doors for us.
Yes, we were social misfits, but all that was fixed as the time passed. Still, even though we did not have much time to talk back then, now that some years have passed, we noticed that we are still bonded by what we went through.
To sum things up, I can advice the same kind of education as mine only to some kids: those who are very stable, very bright, and highly motivated. The rest will drop out, without much ado. Good support from their family would help, but cannot do much if the student does not have it.
If they can pull it off, good for them!
Post Last Updated:27.07.2007 at 07.11