Fashionising.com > Fashion Forums > Business & Investment

Do you think it is better to be the Best of the worst (ie the best person in your class at a non-competitive University) or the worst of the best (ie struggling to compete with other students at the Best university)...

On one hand being the best of the worst means you will excel above others in that field, however being the worst of the best increases your drive and challenges you to become better, but, of course, you are the worst.

Or is this just doing your head in?

I think that the second one suits me better

I'd like to be best of the best failing that, I'd prefer to compete with the best.

Post by Jacky_Bamboo

On one hand being the best of the worst means you will excel above others in that field

In that field, until you get out into the real world and you're suddenly on welfare :D

I'd rather suck with the best of them ;)

yeah, i think i agree with you actually daniel, that way you RULE!!!

yeah I'm with Daniel.. definitely try to suck with the best of them :)

- paul

i think in life its better to compare yourself to those that are better than you, rather than those that are worse than you. It helps combat the ego and keeps you humble, and it always makes you strive to be better. Also- less people hate you :P

best of them rules anyday...